Skip to main content

Find The Technical Issues Costing You Revenue

Your organic traffic should be higher. Your team knows something's wrong but can't pinpoint it. Technical issues are costing you revenue right now. You need a deep technical analysis that finds the real problems, not surface-level recommendations you've seen before. Solutions your development team can actually implement.

The Problem You're Facing

You're planning to:

  • Declining organic traffic despite consistent content efforts
  • Important pages not ranking or indexing properly
  • Technical issues your internal team can't diagnose
  • Site speed or Core Web Vitals problems affecting rankings
  • JavaScript rendering issues Google can't process
  • International or multi-site configuration problems

And you need:

  • Someone who can actually find the root cause, not symptoms
  • Technical depth beyond basic SEO audits
  • Recommendations your dev team can understand and implement
  • Prioritisation based on revenue impact, not just "best practices"
  • Solutions that work for enterprise-scale complexity

The cost: Every day these issues persist, you're losing revenue. Technical problems compound over time.

What This Is

A comprehensive technical SEO audit that goes deeper than standard checklists. I find the issues that are actually costing you revenue and provide specific, prioritised solutions.

This isn't a templated report. It's a deep technical analysis of your specific site, tech stack, and challenges. The kind of audit you'd expect from someone who's solved these problems before at enterprise scale.

Who needs this:

  • Enterprise eCommerce sites with declining organic performance
  • Sites with complex technical issues (JavaScript, multi-market, headless)
  • Companies where technical problems are impacting revenue
  • Teams who've tried basic fixes but need deeper technical expertise

What's Included

Technical Infrastructure Analysis

  • • Crawl budget analysis and optimisation opportunities
  • • Indexing coverage and Google Search Console deep dive
  • • Site architecture and internal linking evaluation
  • • XML sitemaps and robots.txt configuration review
  • • Server response codes and redirect chain analysis

Rendering & JavaScript Analysis

  • • Client-side vs server-side rendering assessment
  • • JavaScript SEO implementation review
  • • Dynamic content rendering validation
  • • Hydration and initial page load analysis
  • • Critical rendering path optimisation

Performance & Core Web Vitals

  • • Page speed and performance analysis
  • • Core Web Vitals assessment (LCP, FID, CLS)
  • • Mobile vs desktop performance comparison
  • • Resource loading and optimisation opportunities
  • • Impact on rankings and user experience

International & Multi-Site SEO

  • • Hreflang implementation review
  • • Multi-regional targeting configuration
  • • International duplicate content issues
  • • Market-specific technical optimisation

Structured Data & Schema

  • • Schema markup implementation review
  • • Rich results opportunities
  • • eCommerce-specific structured data (Product, Offer, Review)
  • • Validation and error resolution

Actionable Recommendations

  • • Prioritised by revenue impact (high/medium/low)
  • • Technical specifications for your dev team
  • • Implementation complexity assessment
  • • Expected business impact for each recommendation
  • • 90-day roadmap for implementation

Investment

$50K-$100K AUD

What affects cost:

  • Site size and complexity
  • Number of markets/languages
  • Tech stack complexity (headless, JavaScript framework)
  • Depth of analysis required

Typical project:

$60K-$80K for enterprise eCommerce technical audit

Payment terms:

50% upfront, 50% on delivery

What You Get

You'll get:

  • Comprehensive technical audit document (50-100+ pages)
  • Executive summary for stakeholders (non-technical)
  • Prioritised recommendations by revenue impact
  • Technical specifications for your dev team
  • 90-day implementation roadmap
  • Live presentation and Q&A with your team
  • 30 days post-delivery support for questions

What clients say:

  • • "Finally an audit that went beyond the basics. Jim found issues our previous agency completely missed. The dev team actually understood the recommendations and could implement them."
  • • "Worth every dollar. The audit paid for itself within 3 months once we fixed the high-priority issues."

Who This Is For

Good fit

  • Enterprise eCommerce with declining organic performance
  • Complex technical issues (JavaScript, headless, multi-market)
  • Development team available to implement recommendations
  • Budget: $50K+ for comprehensive technical analysis
  • Want depth beyond basic SEO audits

Not a fit

  • Looking for basic on-page SEO audit
  • Small sites (under 5K URLs)
  • Budget under $50K
  • Can't implement technical changes
  • Need immediate results (this takes time)

Common Questions

How is this different from other technical audits?

A lot of audits are templated checklists that miss complex issues. This goes deeper. I actually understand your tech stack, can debug rendering problems, and provide solutions for enterprise-scale challenges. I prioritise by revenue impact, not just best practices.

Do you implement the fixes?

No. Your dev team implements (they know your codebase best). I provide technical specifications, answer questions, and can review their work. Implementation is on your team.

How long until we see results?

Depends on how quickly you implement. Some high-priority fixes show results within weeks. Others (like site architecture changes) take months. I provide a realistic timeline in the roadmap.

What access do you need?

Google Search Console, Analytics, crawl access to your site, access to any relevant documentation about your tech stack. Read-only is fine for most things.

Get Started

If technical issues are costing you revenue and you need someone who can actually find the problems, let's talk.

Get in Touch

Free 30-minute conversation. We'll discuss your challenges and whether a technical audit is the right approach.